https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2019.10.058
Filippo Marchelli,1,2
Qinfu Hou,2* Barbara Bosio,3 Elisabetta Arato3
and Aibing Yu2,4
1Faculty of Science
and Technology, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, 39100 Bolzano, Italy
2ARC Research Hub
for Computational Particle Technology, Department of Chemical Engineering,
Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia
3Process Engineering
Research Team, Department of Civil, Chemical and Environmental Engineering,
University of Genova, 16145 Genova, Italy
4Center for Simulation and
Modelling of Particulate Systems, Southeast University - Monash University
Joint Research Institute, Suzhou 215123, PR China
*Corresponding
author. Email: Qinfu.Hou@monash.edu
Spouted beds are commonly simulated through the Computational Fluid
Dynamics – Discrete Element Method approach. The choice of the drag model is
still a matter of debate, as they feature peculiar operative conditions. In
this work, we simulated two spouted beds containing Geldart-D particles. We
tested seven drag models: three are classic models, while four are developed through
advanced computational techniques. The results indicate that the key variable
is the ratio between the operative and the minimum spouting gas velocity (u/ums).
At u=ums only the Gidaspow model can always predict
fluidisation, but at low u/ums values the Beetstra model
is the best compromise. For higher values, the Rong and Di Felice models behave
better, while the others overestimate the particles’ velocity. These results
can be useful to identify the best performing model and show there is a need for more appropriate
models for spouted beds.
Keywords: Eulerian-Lagrangian approach, fluidisation, gas-solid
exchange coefficient, spouted bed, user-defined function.
No comments:
Post a Comment