Everything has two sides. We have to weigh both.
FW:
One reason for the use of biofuels is to reduce the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions associated with liquid transportation fuels. However, the large amount of land needed to displace a sizable fraction of fossil fuel use has raised concerns that land will be used to produce fuels instead of animal feed and food, and that ecosystems may come under additional pressure. In considering the many different ways of producing such fuels, it is possible to envision both good and bad outcomes, depending on the approach (1<http://www.sciencemag.org/content/344/6188/1095.full#ref-1>). Thus, comments about biofuels in recent reports from Working Groups 2 and 3 (WG2 and WG3) of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2<http://www.sciencemag.org/content/344/6188/1095.full#ref-2>, 3<http://www.sciencemag.org/content/344/6188/1095.full#ref-3>) and a recent report by Liska et al. (4<http://www.sciencemag.org/content/344/6188/1095.full#ref-4>) have a special weight in the public discourse.
Feed: Science: Current Issue
Posted on: Friday, 6 June 2014 10:00 AM
Author: Heather Youngs
Subject: [Perspective] Best practices for biofuels
Data-based standards should guide biofuel production Authors: Heather Youngs, Chris Somerville
View article...<http://www.sciencemag.org/content/344/6188/1095.abstract?rss=1>
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteI am pleased to know you found this blog is useful. As an alternative of bookmark, you can subscribe to this blog so that you can receive update automatically. Regards
DeleteBE AWARE! 'click more' in the first comment is an external link.
ReplyDelete